Tuesday, January 31, 2017

2017 Land of the Sky XXX Round 2 Anton Taylor, 1916 - Michael Guthrie, 1757 French: Wing Gambit (C00)

2017 Land of the Sky XXX Round 2 
Anton Taylor, 1916 - Michael Guthrie, 1757 
French: Wing Gambit (C00)

1. e4 e6 2. Nf3 d5 3. e5 c5 4. b4 cxb4 5. a3 bxa3 6. Bxa3 Bxa3 7. Nxa3 Bd7
I have been looking at this gambit and up until now this has been the accepted mainline. It isn't common for masters to gobble the extra pawn so the pool of games in the database drops significantly after move 5. Anyway, there are three choices here c3, c4, or d4. Looking back on this game c4 seems the most active reply but my choice is in the database (but trades away the best piece, the queen's knight. 8. Nb5 Bxb5 9. Bxb5+ Nc6 10. Nd4 Ne7 11. c3 O-O 12. Bxc6 Nxc6 13. Nxc6 bxc6 14. O-O Qc7 15. d4 Rfb8 16. f4 c5? Here is where my opponent begins to play inaccuratelybymissing the point of my previous move. 17. f5! and white achieves equality. the simple g6 or Qc8 removes all of the White counterplay on the previous move. 17. ... c4 18. f6 g6 19. Qd2 Qd8 20. Rf3?
Komodo 10 really hates this move. At the time I was trying to ignore the threat of the advancing past pawn and throw everything at the Black king. I see now that the best white can hope for here is to use the threat of queen and pawn mate (on g7) to tie down the Black queen and then set up an "Alekhine's Gun" against the extra pawn. A balanced position is the result and probably a drawn rook and pawn ending. 20. ... Kh8 21. h4 Qg8 22. Kf2? I made this move in order to play Rh1 but this was white's last chance to tie down the black rooks before they get loose from the pawn and create an advantage. 22. ... Rb7! The power of this move was what I missed when followed by Rab8. Here the weakness of Rf3 becomes clear, the white rooks are uncoordinated and hopelessly so. 23. h5?? There is not enough time for this to be an effective method of attack but there is nothing better than committing to the bad plan that White started by playing Rf3 earlier. 23. ... g5 White is completely lost after this. 24. h6 Rab8 25. Ra2 Qg6 26. Rg3 Rg8 27. Rb2 Rxb2 28. Qxb2 Qxh6 29. Qb7 g4 30. Re3 Qf4+ 31. Ke2 g3 32. Kd2 Qf2+ 33. Re2 Qf5 34. Kc1 Qf1+ 35. Kd2 Qa1 36. Qxf7 Qb2+ 37. Kd1 Qb1+ 38. Kd2 Qd3+ 39. Ke1 Qxc3+ 40. Rd2 Qc1+ 41. Ke2 c3 42. Rd1?? Ra2 is the most logical reply but the text was the only chance to potentially slip away ... although there is really no chance as White's king gets caught out the open in numerous variations. Qc2+ 0-1

My conclusions from this game is that the wing gambit is just a bit lacking in bite against black. There are some exploitable tactics. It may be a viable option against class players in G/30 or faster time controls. However, with an hour it isn't quite there and I would have to do a lot more study in the line before I could use it with competence.

Here is the real problem. I have no real response to the French, at least none that are satisfying to me. This goes back to the opening repertoire questions I have already brought up. It may be best to look at the black side of the french. That way I can potentially use the french as a surprise weapon in the future. That's not at the top of my chess srudy to-do list but it is on there. 

Monday, January 30, 2017

2017 Land of the Sky XXX Round 1 Peter Michelman, 2072 - Anton Taylor, 1916 English: Anglo-Dutch (A10)

2017 Land of the Sky XXX Round 1 
Peter Michelman, 2072 - Anton Taylor, 1916 
English: Anglo-Dutch (A10)

1. c4 f5 2. g3 Nf6 3. Bg2 e6 4. Nc3 d5 5. d4 Bb4 Up until this Bishop move things have been quite normal and numerous games between masters exist in the position. simply c6 or Be7 are by far more common developing moves. The move c6 is preferred. I take another path in this game that quickly goes wrong. 6. Nf3 O-O 7. O-O c5??
Games by masters have continued c6. This move loses on the spot as the following moves will show. 8. cxd5 Bxc3 9. bxc3 exd5 10. Ba3 I debated on what to play here. My first choice was Ne4. I missed that the knight also hits the pawn on c3 as well as defending c5. So instead I play the grossly losing b6 with an even worse idea following. 10. ... b6 11. dxc5 Qe7 12. Ng5 I wasn't clear on why White would choose this move. Nd4 seemed better. 12. ... Bb7?? This loses immediately but the only real alternative (Rd8) is positionally lost. There are too many tactics in the air for Black to hold together or create useful complications. 13. c6! 1-0

This was a really embarrassing loss. My opponent is nowhere near master strength but that is the smallest problem I had with losing this game. This was played on board two of the Under 2200 section. The organizers had set up DGT electronic boards and were broadcasting the top games in each section live over the internet. So, the result of this game is that my first online featured live game was falling into a miniature by making an obviously bad choice.

My conclusion from this game is two-fold

First, I need to stop playing blitz. Or at least not with a view to actually win. If I'm in attacking mode I play in this way: Cavalier, unsound, and completely recoverable in a five minute game. this creates problems for online opponents and they fold under the pressure. When someone has hours to work on problems such moves are losing.

Second, I must develop a systematic method of creating and maintaining an opening repertoire. up until now I have depended on my memory and intuition to determine most of my opening choices, This has worked out in most games but in the special cases that crop up now and then where the wrong move is thematic and the right move is counter-intuitive I go wrong. I was recently reminded of Samuel Reshevsky who would study openings tirelessly and couldn't remember anything he studied. His poor memory is legendary.
GM Samuel Reshevsky
My memory is not so poor. However, my intuition is not developed enough in the openings I'm playing to not prepare a repertoire. But how to do it systematically? I'm not skilled in the use of custom chess databases. More research is needed.

Tuesday, January 24, 2017

Mistake Check-in #1

The Mistakes

Poor Concentration – Nearly all of my losses have come from a loss of concentration. I lose interest in the position as time passes and lose my grip on what is needed. This has resulted in disaster (the game against IM Ronald Burnett at the smokey mountain open) as well as narrow escapes. My game against Woodward at Winter Sucks and the game against Deshpande at the smokey mountain open are great examples.

Playing Without a Plan – I find myself many times questioning what I'm doing in a given position. I may play objectively the best move and then on the very next move I'll miss the idea behind the previous move and flounder about. I find this in blitz as well … I tend to push the pieces around a few moves sometimes before finding the right idea.

Time Management – I find in blitz situations I save too much time by moving too quickly in key positions. This is ironically the opposite problem form what most people associate with time trouble.

King Safety – I still have issues with my king's safety. This mostly occurs in blitz. I often miss long-range tactics involving queens, bishops, and rooks against my king.

Pawn Weaknesses – This is a bad habit I have gotten from blitz. It can be seen in a few games previously. Pawn structure has taken a back seat in my mind in place of piece activity. So far I have won games by making piece moves that were unexpected. In positions where there are no comfortable piece moves I often make embarrassing pawn moves that destabilize the position.

Conclusions

Planlessness (if that's a word), time issues, and even king safety boils down to the problem of concentration. It is worth researching concentration training methods outside of chess. When I find a direction for concentration training I will share it with the readers and put it into action.


I know I have some books and other study materials on pawn structure. It is time to dust those off and reignite my connection to the “soul of chess” as Philidor called the pawns.

Thursday, January 19, 2017

2017 Winter Sucks Round 5 Anton Taylor, 1906 - Connor Zhang, 1551 Ruy Lopez Closed (C90)

2017 Winter Sucks Round 5
Anton Taylor, 1906 - Connor Zhang, 1551
Ruy Lopez Closed (C90)
http://chessmicrobase.com/microbases/9425/games/919185

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 b5 5. Bb3 Nf6 6. O-O Be7 7. Re1 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. a4 
The best objective move is 9. h3 but I played this move to muddy the waters for my opponent. That's not the best idea but it made a fun game. 9. ... Bg4 10. h3 Bh5 11. Qe2 b4 12. Bd5? Up until this move we have followed a game Kosteniuk-Nikolic 2005 instead of my Bd5? Kosteniuk played a5 with a gain of space. d3 is also a potential alternative to the troubles white makes for himself with Bd5. 12. ... Qd7? Nxd5 followed by Na5 was the bid for a black advantage. This move in a sense justifies Bd5. 13. Bxc6 Qxc6 14. cxb4? A bad move for a number of reasons. Firstly, it concedes the bid for the center as finished as d4 is no longer supported. And secondly, it leaves white's b-pawn and d-pawn with no clear home or future. So, while it may look like I win a pawn (temporarily) this actually loses the extra pawn and probably a second pawn. d4 is the correct move. 14. ... Rab8 15. b5 I realize the hopelessness of my position and elect to return the pawn in exchange for putting a piece on a square where I can attack it with a knight trying to catch up my development. 15. ...axb5 16. axb5 Rxb5 17. Nc3 Rbb8 18. d3 d5 Had I seen the e-pawn is hanging I would have played g4 in response to this move. Instead, I saw ghosts. 19. Bg5 dxe4 20. Nxe4 Bxf3 21. Qxf3 
I was very happy with this position. the threat of Nxf6 followed by Qxc6 is rather scary. My opponent wrote down Rxb2 in his notation book and then quickly scratched it out when he saw the tactic. I said nothing but let him rethink. It wasn't long before he made a similarly fatal error. 21. ... Nxe4?? 22. Bxe7 Rfe8 23. Ba3 Qf6 24. Qxe4 h6 25. Rac1 Qb6 26. Rc6 Qa5 27. Rec1 Rec8 28. R6c5 Qb6 29. Rxe5 c6 30. Re7 Rb7 31. Re8+ Rxe8 32. Qxe8+ Kh7 33. Rxc6 Qd4 34. Qe4+ Qxe4 35. dxe4 g6 36. f3 Kg7 37. b4 Rd7 38. Bb2+ Kh7 39. Rc8 g5 40. g4?? Rd1+! would win the piece back. My opponent misses his chance to win and instead loses from here. Rb7 41. Rh8+ Kg6 42. Rg8+ Kh7 43. Rg7+ Kh8 44. Rxf7+ Kg8 45. Rxb7 and with mate coming soon black resigned.

Tuesday, January 17, 2017

2017 Winter Sucks Round 4 CM Billy Woodward, 2015 - Anton Taylor, 1906 Dutch Rubinstein (A84)

2017 Winter Sucks Round 4
CM Billy Woodward, 2015 - Anton Taylor, 1906
Dutch Rubinstein (A84)

1. d4 f5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. h3 I have never seen this move before. As it turns out my response is the main response in the sideline. Always a good sign. 4. ... b6 5. Nf3 Bb4 6. Bd2 Bb7 7. e3 Nc6 8. Qc2 Qe7 9. O-O-O a5 10. d5? Up until this move the position is equal. I sensed this move was bad but failed to find a satisfactory refutation. 10. ... Bxc3 11. Bxc3 Nb4 
When I played a5 the idea was to gain space in an equal position and placing pawns on squares of the bishop I knew I'd be trading (always a good idea). It seems lucky that the move supports this strike. If I were Alekhine I envision saying something like "ah! The point all along!" but this was luck on principle, not analysis. 12. Qb1 exd5 13. a3 
This position is definitely worth a diagram. I played Na6, again working on principle instad of concrete analysis. The c5 square looks great for the knight. Komodo gives 13. ... dxc4! when there is no adequate defense to Be4 and axb4? opens the file for the rook and the white king gets hunted down. 13. ... Na6 14. Qxf5 O-O 15. Qc2 dxc4 16. Bxc4+ d5?? For the third time in this game I play on principle instead of analysis. I did not manage my time very efficiently in this game at all. I made this move almost immediately and it is a blunder. The simple Kh8 gives an equal position with chances. 17. Bxf6 Qxf6 18. Rxd5 Kh8 19. Ng5 g6 20. Ne4 Qg7 21. Rd4 Bxe4 22. Qxe4 Nc5 23. Qc2 Rad8 24. Rhd1 Rxd4 25. Rxd4 Qf6 26. Rd2 Kg7 27. e4 Qf4 28. Qc3+ Kh6 29. f3 Rd8 30. b3 b5?? With both players in time trouble I make a potentially decisive error. I am already completely lost but this is just sad to allow white even greater possibilities. 31. Bd5 Na6 and in a time scramble I manage to trade my knight for the bishop and extra pawn, trade the queens off, and simplify into a drawn rook endgame escaping disaster. 1/2-1/2